leftlabels.blogg.se

1. #ATOMIC HEART RAY TRACING DRIVERS#
2. #ATOMIC HEART RAY TRACING PRO#
3. #ATOMIC HEART RAY TRACING SIMULATOR#

#ATOMIC HEART RAY TRACING DRIVERS#

This shows that with the Arc A770 can keep up with the Nvidia card, and it just needs some more tweaking with the drivers and software. The Arc A770 managed to get 61 FPS, whereas the RTX 4060 still eked out a victory with 66 FPS. This controversial game ran similarly on both cards.The RTX 4060 had a peak temperature of 66☌, whereas the Arc A770 was much hotter at around 75☌.Īlso Read: ARC A750 Vs RTX 3060 Atomic Heart (Native) Atomic Heat (Image By Tech4Gamers) Temperatures did not improve in this title.The Arc A770 managed to get by with 188 watts, whereas the RTX 4060 had a peak power draw of about 117 watts. Power consumption was once again greater on the Arc GPU, though this game’s difference was not as drastic.The Arc A770 had 1% lows of about 32 FPS, whereas the RTX 4060 had higher 1% lows of about 43 FPS. Fortunately, the 1% lows of both cards did not dip much more than the average framerates, reducing stutters.The RTX 4060 had a barely playable average framerate of 52 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 had an average of 37 FPS. Being a less optimized game, Star Wars Jedi Survivor did not run great on either card.It had a peak temperature of about 76☌, whereas the RTX 4060 had a lower peak temperature of 68☌.Īlso Read: RTX 4060 Vs RX 7600 Star Wars Jedi Survivor (RT On, FSR Q) Star Wars Jedi Survivor (Image By Tech4Gamers) The Intel card’s higher power draw also made it warmer.The Arc A770 had a power draw of about 216 watts, whereas the RTX 4060 had a power draw closer to 118 watts. Despite Intel’s lower performance, it was less power efficient than the RTX 4060.The RTX 4060 had 1% lows of about 54 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 had lows of about 37 FPS. 1% lows were also unpleasant on the Intel card.Do note that the higher result of the RTX 4060 is due to the frame generation technology we left on. In the first game of our benchmark tests, the RTX 4060 got 69 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 got around 45 FPS.Hogwarts Legacy (RT On, DLSS 3/XeSS Q) Hogwarts Legacy (Image By Tech4Gamers)

#ATOMIC HEART RAY TRACING PRO#

CPU – AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D / PBO ON / Curv.Opti.Below are the specifications of the test bench: The tests were conducted at the resolution of 1440p on a suitable test bench. These tests are designed to maximize the capabilities of each graphics card and evaluate their performance in handling graphics bottlenecks. Now that we’ve examined the core specifications of each card, in this section, where we compare the RTX 4060 vs Arc A770, we will look at the performance of these cards in realistic gaming scenarios. The Upscaling implementation is also more impressive on the 4060, using frame generation technology in the latest DLSS 3. Other Features: Both the RTX and Arc card have RT cores, though they are much more mature on the RTX 4060.In comparison, the Nvidia RTX 4060 has a significantly lower TDP of 115W, which reflects that it is more suited to server workloads. TDP: The Intel Arc A770 has a TDP of 225W.On the other hand, the Nvidia RTX 4060 has a narrower 128-bit bus width, which is borderline unacceptable for a modern card. Bus Width: The Intel Arc A770 has a wide 256-bit memory bus.The Nvidia RTX 4060 has 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, which may impact its performance in modern memory-intensive games. VRAM: The Intel Arc A770 features 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM.The lower base clock of the RTX 4060 allows it to use any power or generate heat when idle barely. The Nvidia RTX 4060 has a base clock of 1830MHz and a boost clock of 2460MHz.

#ATOMIC HEART RAY TRACING SIMULATOR#

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 (DLSS 3/FSR Q).Arc A770 Vs RTX 4060: Gaming Benchmarks.